What differentiates bribery from reinforcement?

The correct distinction between bribery and reinforcement lies in the timing of the item provided. In the context of reinforcement, the desired behavior occurs first, and the reinforcer is provided immediately following that behavior to increase the likelihood of the behavior being repeated in the future. This timing is crucial as it helps the individual make the connection between their action and its positive consequence, thereby effectively shaping behavior over time.

In contrast, bribery typically involves offering something of value before the desired behavior occurs, creating a transactional mindset rather than positively reinforcing a behavior. For example, telling a child they can have a treat if they behave well is a scenario more aligned with bribery, as it implies a quid pro quo and removes the natural learning process that reinforcement should foster.

In this way, the timing of when the item is offered fundamentally shifts the purpose of the interaction: reinforcement aims to teach and encourage positive behavior, while bribery may undermine core behavioral principles by creating dependence on rewards inappropriately.